Create account

anarchovegan
replied 1923d
I can cancel my Netflix subscription.
I can't cancel my government "subscription".
I can't fire them.
How is it a service if I can't fire them?
That's why I call it theft.
replied 1923d
You can do it. For example, you can go to the jungle and live there as a hunter and gatherer.
replied 1923d
Not really. If you ever make a village you can bet your ass they will come asking for property taxes.
replied 1923d
I forgot to add that you should live as a nomad.
replied 1923d
So it's not that they let you, it's that you are on the run. I bet they would hunt down even nomads if they had high income. 🙂
replied 1922d
Yes, that's true (for us citizens).
replied 1923d
"You can cancel your Netflix by moving out of the country"
replied 1923d
You can avoid using Netflix, but you can't avoid the public roads, as long as you live in the country. That's why you either have to pay taxes or leave the country for the jungle.
replied 1921d
I can't avoid public roads? Are you seriously saying this? Also, using raids as the single justification for taking nearly half of my income is just laughable (which they aren't BTW)
anarchovegan
replied 1921d
Yes, you can. You can also rape babies.
That you can doesn't mean you should.
Like advocating the systematic theft.
I don't think running away from this cancer is moral.
So I don't.
replied 1923d
The stable area is a significant part of the service. This is why canceling the service requires you leaving. Staying is opting in. You must opt out.
anarchovegan
replied 1921d
I don't think running away from the cancer of people advocating systematic theft is moral.
So I don't. How does my staying here validate my being stolen from?
replied 1913d
"stable area" is so far removed from the myriad of entitlements the gov redistributes. many people would be happy paying just for that. dont want all the crap gov dreams up.
replied 1912d
Ah, that sounds very libertarian. A limited government still needs to collect taxes, just far less. Likely could survive off of just sales tax, and no income tax.
replied 1912d
yeah it is ;P lol. sales tax only would be nice. & i wonder how far donations only could go (esp for things like helping the poor but also for defense).
replied 1912d
I think defense can not have such uncertainty. I would want him still funded by taxes. Same with thigs like water and sewage. Healthcare and social security as well.
replied 1911d
The market provides many things stably. Its not always the same people but the result is the same. Grocery store is a good example. Gov isn’t need to say each store must stock bread.
replied 1911d
It happens naturally & there has always been bread at the store whenever I’ve wanted some. Not necessarily the same brand or kind but it’s there.
replied 1911d
Not to mention the market provide accountability to these activities. Many gov agencies are incompetent yet their budget keeps increasing
replied 1911d
Things that follow market sources should. Supply and demand is a great self regulating system. Not all thigs obey market forces though.
replied 1911d
everything caves to market forces sooner or later.
replied 1911d
replied 1911d
What I mean is that not all things can follow market forces, or be regulated by supply and demand.
replied 1907d
“Follow market forces” really just means people respond to price information. If price information is corrupted or obscured (as in healthcare) then yes, market forces do not work.
replied 1907d
I think it is the product that is the main problem. Life, or death, often make it an immeasurable problem. Also it is cheaper to prevent, than treat usually.
replied 1906d
& market can also spread risk around (insurance) in a way that still discourages reckless behavior (eg smoking)
replied 1906d
unlike political solutions that restrict the use of historical data that is "racist" or "sexist" or whatever by current political standards to accurately price insurance
replied 1906d
true, though this would bias survival to people who plan, & people who can afford to be reckless (though they would be draining their resources at a faster rate).
replied 1907d
The solution though is to return to accurate price information (freer market), not to further obscure price information by adding new rules, laws, and bureaucracy.
replied 1907d
That would be helpful at least. There are a lot of ways prices have been obscured over time. I think Americans often pay more for drugs to cover selling them cheaper in poor nations.
replied 1906d
& you're right prices can be inelastic (needing treatment for a life-threatening disease). But markets generally create alternatives & competition drives down prices/increases quality
replied 1906d
yeah, think that would help the situation a lot but it would be difficult. & US does pay more (is that a patent thing?)
replied 1906d
Pharmaceutical companies give away a lot of parasite drugs to third world nations for free. Some of the cheaper drugs are to compete with generic versions though. Some are offset price
replied 1906d
what is a parasite drug?
replied 1906d
oh you mean drugs to literally treat parasites?
replied 1906d
Yes. Parasite are a huge problem in some developing nations.