Create account

Avalanche seems like a great idea the more I hear about it. Helos scaling, and protection against double spends.
replied · 149d
I agree. Safe 0-conf is huge for merchant adoption.
replied · 151d
And that's precisely why anti-BCH and BSV shills attack it so much and FUD it, because it's a step in the right direction. BSV doesn't even try to address these issues, it does wants
replied · 151d
just wants to fulfill "Satoshi's Vision" (taking ownership of the brand),and just another step in a strategy devised years ago which is trying to make hardforking away of BS impossible
replied · 151d
No it has some issues. It changes the "incentives of bitcoin", it changes how bitcoin works, it's not necessary, and some others things
replied · 151d
Does it have to change how Bitcoin works though? It looks like it can be used for preconsensus about what transactions go in a block. Cant it work within blockchain PoW?
replied · 151d
And it works within PoW, just allows for a quick mempool sync. I wouldn't dare to say it doesn't touch economics incentives without more research, though.
replied · 150d
The most obvious way I can see it touching economic incentives is by not letting the miner decide which transactions to include. It would just include all that reached avalanche.
replied · 151d
Great idea for a centrally planed miners uncompetitive socialist coin.
replied · 151d
No, it isn't for BSV. It is for BCH. I guess BSV could also use it, but it would go against their plan to not allow any innovation.
replied · 138d
Innovation 😂🤣😂