or whatever. And yes, since "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", this is within reason to object if this 9:49 claim is to be taken seriously. It really taints it all.
All this of course does not mean I would have believed it in any case. So many such claims have been made, either all these creators are attacked by some entity, or they are scammers.
And I fail to see what should make this thing work anyway (not that I claim I am 100% competent on the science involved).
