Transaction

Hash
955effed1cd173c23947433421a2bad7c97ee8c33b6399e419aade85e4b35b64
Block
549108 · 2018-09-23 03:54 · 38,299 confirmations
Data
memo-like
Size
272 bytes
Fee
278 sats (1.022058845 sat/B)
replied · 267d
changes that by themselves do nothing bad, but when combined with other innocent looking “refactoring” spells disaster?


Inputs

Index
0

304502210099bf2654fbc6928c13ddf8607c7f58a7758e884c4c8077e42fed3e3c41c23bc60220676fba91888f0d1c55e1dedd4d0432cf9093765399adaf0315932065ee1ea53c41 0203887b6e6e1821746727601c159c84704a31dfcc6710b4b989bf1abfbd157530


Outputs

Index
0

OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b3e6bba580e5a1e5ef541f6bec991ce576f904ce OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

Index
1
Type
OP_RETURN

OP_RETURN 6d04 bbf51b987642f23d154042f9b071e191f79b2d62f09605c51a85f98d8055a8ca

OP_DUP OP_HASH160 2559643c87992cc12fba4643ca152285c7d7c6b5 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

Raw

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