Create account

replied 1719d
If he makes a claim, and you counter it, he usually just drops the claim like he never said it, and makes other claims. This must mean he doesn't really believe in the claims himself
replied 1715d
Basically his discussion technique is one that 4-year-old could see through. You say something, he replies "that's dumb", you reply to that, he replies "that too is dumb". And so on.
replied 1715d
He refuses to explain why the thing is "dumb", even when challenged, which almost certainly means he doesn't really know, he just slabs on that label to everything without thinking.
replied 1715d
Since he is quite happy to do this seemingly forever, it is no surprise he often gets in the last word, people just have better things to do than correcting him forever like this.
replied 1715d
Especially since he is willing to lie about the whole thing, and most people are not interested in reading such a quarrel anyway. This of course does not mean he is "right".
replied 1715d
But he is happy to pretend that it does. For that sake, he is happy to pretend that he is right even when this for some reason does not happen.
replied 1593d
In other words, he "backs up" his claim with troll tactics, which of course only means he is a troll.
replied 1718d
Examples:
replied 1718d
https://memo.cash/a/c9b7faa4e5
First he makes the unfounded (opposite of truth) claim that I make claims, he makes arguments. When that is challenged, he simply adds a new accusation
replied 1718d
that me and TheLegendaryTwatter (called Twatter) are the same person, and repeats the claim.
replied 1718d
When I ignore his new accusation and elaborate on my stance toward his false "I make arguments, you make claims" claim, he adds a couple of new accusations, all unfounded and untrue,
replied 1718d
(911 stuff and so on) and he now no longer mentions the earlier mentioned false claim. Later he repeats the accusations that have not yet been addressed.
replied 1718d
If they were addressed, the standard SILENTSAM pattern is that he would invent new ones, with no regard for truth, decency or even consistency with his earlier claims.
replied 1718d
Maybe he just wants you too think critically?
replied 1718d
If you had read what I said, you would know that he uses this as a troll tactic.
replied 1718d
He hardly seems like a troll, what do you think he wants?
replied 1718d
What SILENTSAM always gravitates toward is a pissing contest. The stance he always favors is the official narrative. He also seems totally without decency, i.e. he lies, distorts etc.
replied 1718d
Sidenote2: It is in the nature of platforms like Memo that I cannot ever prove that I am not Twatter. Therefore such an accusation is usually a troll tactic.
replied 1718d
If you want to hear me say it: I am not Twatter, and I have have zero affiliation with him beyond the casual public conversation I have had with him on Memo.
replied 1712d
You should ignore SilentSam, he is a dog turd pretending to be a human being.

All words are wasted on him.
replied 1707d
You are quite right about this of course. I have had a bad habit of not wanting some of the more crazy stuff he says to go unchallenged, but he says too much such stuff.
replied 1712d
It's funny how you get so upset about it. It is just a guess. Seems you both likes the same way of talking, and I think at one point you continued a conversation after switching.
replied 1718d
Sidenote1: He makes no arguments in favor of the claim. So his actions (he actually makes claims, not arguments) go against what he repeatedly says he is doing.