Create account

replied 1163d
No, like this.

A naked bitch is tagged art & heavily rewarded w/o nsfw tag but that usually gets you flagged into oblivion on Hive. Bigotry max.
replied 1163d
Woman (like most women) whining that standards that are heavily tweaked in their favor are not even more heavily tweaked that way, managing to pretend to herself that she is oppressed.
replied 1163d
Only reason why she is rewarded is bc art represent nude woman.
If I, also female, painted a nude man, it would be flagged in2 oblivion.
It's not ab/ who is artist, but ab/ tits.
replied 1163d
I don't think there is any hope of helping you see that you are conditioned to think this way by genes/culture/feminism, but you are. This is all in your mind.
replied 1163d
I didn't invite you to help me in anything. Male nudity inbany form is flagged because all the cocks who find it insulting. That's my point & it has nothing to do with your rant
replied 1162d
This is quite natural, dick are indeed treated as far more insulting than boobs. First, this is a cultural norm, one that in most cases is a burden for men to bear.
replied 1162d
For example, female parents with an innocent child who receives pictures, either of boobs from a woman or of dicks from a man, >99% would be far more upset about the latter.
replied 1162d
2nd dicks are direct genitalia, boobs are not. 3rd boobs are half out in the open all the time all over the place. In the street in summer for example. Women love to show them off.
replied 1162d
4th, dicks are male bodyparts, therefore seen as safe to be looked down upon, women parts are not. Male things are seen as "ugly" and "insulting", women parts as "beautiful" "sacred".
replied 1162d
Again, this is mostly a burden for men to bear. Of course, you manage to convince yourself that men being shunned like this is actually instead about women being deliberately oppressed
replied 1161d
You are legit moron. It is about female artist receiving $ for nudity art on Hive while otherwise is punished. It has nothing w oppression but with you being delusional obviously.
replied 1161d
You claim it has nothing to do with oppression, I do not believe you. You were basically complaining that you could not post a picture of male nudity. You think this is unfair
replied 1161d
The rules are there for everyone so, not just male nudity, or any NSFW topic, & I asked ab/ it ( in specific!!) & there was only silence. It is not oppression , it's $.
replied 1161d
I cannot blame them for not wanting to talk with you. After having seen how you would rather make generic insults than talk normally, no wonder they don't want to do that.
replied 1161d
You are only one who got that.
replied 1161d
And they did. Without inventing any theories around imaginary themes.
replied 1160d
I'm sure you gonna change your narrative again here, but you did say "there was only silence". Now you say they replied. Either very sloppy description, or direct lie.
replied 1160d
Or time difference, when they did.
replied 1162d
So now I need your invitation in order to be allowed to answer what you said on a site with features specifically made for making such answers. Otherwise I am oppressing you I suppose.
replied 1163d
You don't get it. Nudity of any sort has to be tagged with NSFW on Hive Blockchain otherwise is flagged. It has nothing with feminism but FACTS. That's it.
replied 1162d
The part where the feminism comes in is not in these "FACTS" (which I don't trust at all btw, but let's assume you are right for the sake of the argument), but in your interpretation.
replied 1161d
Facts - nudity NSFW obligatory tag on Hive Blockchain. Artist made full body nude art piece. They rewarded abuse post. You rant ab/ irrelevant things that has nothing w/ this case.
replied 1161d
Your original post painted a very different picture, where you talked about boobs and about posting similar male pictures. Sorry that I could not guess that you painted a wrong picture
replied 1162d
You invaded a probably mainly male space, and any rule or tendency you see, you automatically interpret as An Affront To Women, and Deliberate Attempts To Oppress Women.
replied 1161d
Artist is a women, half of curators are.
replied 1161d
I did say probably, though it was indeed a guess. That said, feminists are quite happy to complain about patriarchy abusing women when actually women are doing the act.
replied 1161d
Yeah, those are called sociopaths, regardless to gender.
replied 1162d
If I were to enter a women only space, you would not think twice about asking to get me removed from the place if I did not respect the rules to pander to women in that space.
replied 1161d
Rules call for NSFW tag, space is Hive Blockchain.
replied 1161d
This does not answer what I said.
replied 1161d
Because you do not know what it is.
replied 1161d
Also, you are very sloppy with your wording. This sentence can be interpreted as anything. Another sign that you know you are losing. You'd want to be clear if you knew you were right.
replied 1160d
Your imagination can interpret it in any way. Issue was solved.
replied 1161d
> This sentence can be interpreted as anything
"Have that report on my desk by Friday" has 32 unique equally valid meanings
;t=1226s
@20:26
replied 1162d
Yet, you insist on being allowed to invade all male spaces and act as if it is the most natural thing in the world to change all the rules there in order to put women on a pedestal.
replied 1161d
Rule is NSFW tag. Artist is a woman.
It is not a male space.
replied 1162d
Oh, and this is not just something I make up on the spot. This is a CLASSIC pattern. Men create spaces, and keep them going. Women overtake them with shaming and other female tactics.
replied 1161d
You can't overtake Hive, it is decentralized. Nudity of any sort is flagged unless it has NSFW tag. If a woman artist can paint her pussy w/o so others should paint a dick.
replied 1161d
A decentralized space which in your words still has rules that are enforced by "curators", that you feel oppressed by. And you try to overtake them, by forcing them to change rules.
replied 1161d
We have a common reward pool. Everybody is a curator on Hive. Rules were set by a community: nudity w/o NSFW tag, plagiarism, spam, identity fraud, phishing, etc.
replied 1162d
They do not think twice about poisoning the well with such tactics, which also include backstabbing, victim mentality, tantrums, false accusations, public image destruction, ...
replied 1161d
You are legit incapable of logic.
I objected to a female using her naked snatch to get money and I was requesting that male artist can do the same & you rant at me ab/ feminism!?
replied 1161d
You made a rant about sagging boobs and the like. Again you are changing your story to win the argument. If this was the case, you would have led with this, not with insults.
replied 1161d
Yes, this is a case, learn to read b4 going to lengths w/o any understanding of a situation. Or change your damn glasses.
replied 1161d
There you go again. Insults instead of reasoning, because you are losing.
replied 1161d
And the fact that you still use insults all over the place is because you know you are losing.
replied 1161d
I will use any damn verbal expression I choose to, if you dislike what you are receiving a solution is very simple.
replied 1163d
Yea, since having society with only women or only men does not work, and this group of "oppressed" women are ruining society, that is uncomfortable to watch.
replied 1162d
And let's talk about all useless dicks who ruin world with wars and shit. I never heard a woman leader started a war, only old crazy men. Same w/ conquest & religious executions
replied 1162d
So why not talking about real ducks who are danger to society without prejudice & bullshitery. Let me know if you find a person who can deliver on discussion bwahaha.
replied 1162d
I certainly did not find that you can. Apparently your theoretical perceived inequality was not easy enough to defend, so you felt the need to run away from it and change the issue.
replied 1162d
perceived injustice*.
replied 1162d
Theoretical!? Say it straight, you just here to babble some nonsense shit & argue w/ air. Sucks to suck, but ur an idiot & I'm off to better stuff.
replied 1162d
Theoretical as in you said "this is gonna happen if I do this thing, therefore I am oppressed", not that it actually happened. I can say it: You are just here to babble nonsense [...].
replied 1163d
Oppressed my ass. They use any excuse for spot light and more money.